Development snapshot, Nov 2026: what YuktiBOS is today
What YuktiBOS is today, what is built, what is still open, and an invitation.
Articles
AI-built software has a credibility problem, and the cure is evidence. These articles come from our own working documents: the bug list, the wrong fixes and the bill that did not reconcile.
What YuktiBOS is today, what is built, what is still open, and an invitation.
23 of 23 articles

Our AI posts cost Rs 5 and were “pathetic”. Plain chat beat our pipeline, so we built a lab to stop guessing.

We checked our own scorer against careful readers, and it mostly failed.

More context gave worse posts. We replaced raw chunks with a checked fact store.

“Be efficient” looked harmful to the scorer and harmless to readers. What that says about measuring.

We collected real posts instead of guessing what good looks like. Here is what the data can and cannot say.

Cost is a system-design problem. We traced every call, and our own spend figures were still wrong.

91 of 284 pieces called a company a board game. The cause was our input, not the models.

29 products read, six groups, one gap: the full loop with a human approval, in plain language.

We watched what people do, gave them a finished document, and used speech for ideas, not style.

Quotes checked by code, six parts, no colours. AI can write, but beliefs it cannot write.

Code ranks, AI drafts, a person picks. Plus stickiness and story cards.

Arithmetic from typed numbers only, an offer card, and an honest note on what is not yet reviewed.

Estimate first, budgets per run, and a 25-item bug list.

Stages outside the engine, fact ids, and a hand-over a person can take at any step.

Find, word, approve, apply, re-check, and the public checkup we have not built yet.

Seven leaking lists, uncounted AI spend, no new role: what is built and what is only a plan.

Everything went through one machine, and “Done” did not mean done.

Three redesigns in five days, driven by the lab.

Lean is what you build. Clean is what the user sees.

A schema diff that runs first, and a database driver that landed in the browser bundle.

Two multiplications, a refused bandage, and the sequel in November.

Six of twelve build steps in one spec rebuilt things that already existed.

An offline correlation of 0.92 is not a result.
Tell us. Several of them have been wrong. Or tell us the job you want done and we will say whether it exists, is half built or is not started.